An eagerly-awaited feature for XenForo 1.1, here is a first look at the new thread prefixes system, with a special guest appearance!
AwesomeIt automatically indexes all settings, from add-ons and the core. The system is also completely open, so any data at all can be added to Admin CP search.
I want my users to self-categorize their threads so that their thread can be grouped to other threads. Ideally other users can also categorize the threads, and they can vote for and against a categorization. I don't care how the categorization is called: prefixes, tags, forums. Users should do that (giving a prefix to a thread, tagging a thread, creating a thread within a special forum and therein categorize it with the forum title). The big problem lies that threads can be mis-categorized! So a prefix should be renamed, or if you use tags, the tags should be changed. Or if you use forums, you have to move the thread to another forum. Now it is rather unfair to the prefixes that with the admin-categorization "forums" you have multiple sub-categorization possibilities where the prefixes only have one level of categorization With sub-prefixes you can build your whole community with just one forum. Think out of the box
I like ideasI think I've been thinking outside of that box for a while now - My ideal forum structure would do away with the hard limits of a tree-structured list of forums. Instead, you'd take the list of forums and apply them as tags, so that a thread can appear in multiple 'forums' - for instance, a thread called "Steam trains on the London Underground" would appear in the London, Transport and History forums.
I have a few ideas that would work well with your idea.Forums as overlapping circles in a Venn diagram, instead of isolated islands as they are now. This is a half-way solution between forums and user-generated tags. Although XF could be made to work like this with redirects,
Definitely, and that ship has sailedI think that such a structure would need to be taken account of from the start.
It does look solid.On Topic: Prefix system looks excellent
Exactly what I suggested as a categorisation tool: Use one categorisation tool and not more.I think I've been thinking outside of that box for a while now - My ideal forum structure would do away with the hard limits of a tree-structured list of forums. Instead, you'd take the list of forums and apply them as tags, so that a thread can appear in multiple 'forums' - for instance, a thread called "Steam trains on the London Underground" would appear in the London, Transport and History forums. Forums as overlapping circles in a Venn diagram, instead of isolated islands as they are now. This is a half-way solution between forums and user-generated tags. Although XF could be made to work like this with redirects, I think that such a structure would need to be taken account of from the start.
On Topic: Prefix system looks excellent
I want my users to self-categorize their threads so that their thread can be grouped to other threads. Ideally other users can also categorize the threads, and they can vote for and against a categorization. I don't care how the categorization is called: prefixes, tags, forums. Users should do that (giving a prefix to a thread, tagging a thread, creating a thread within a special forum and therein categorize it with the forum title). The big problem lies that threads can be mis-categorized! So a prefix should be renamed, or if you use tags, the tags should be changed. Or if you use forums, you have to move the thread to another forum. Now it is rather unfair to the prefixes that with the admin-categorization "forums" you have multiple sub-categorization possibilities where the prefixes only have one level of categorization With sub-prefixes you can build your whole community with just one forum. Think out of the box
wouldn't it be here:Looks great.
View attachment 18924
I never use that.wouldn't it be here:
View attachment 18925
more logical`?? (it belongs IMO there because it's a display option)
I agree with thisI never use that.
accessing filtering options at the bottom of the page feels weird.
But I just looked and it was there.
I think 90% of average users won't look there.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.