I'm trying to understand the use case, that's all.
We might have explained this in the past, but it's not just the X minutes to add an option. Everything has some sort of overhead, even something as trivial as an option. Not just an overhead in terms of performance but potential code complexity, the UI, support, testing, stability, scope for introducing bugs etc. Many of these things might not apply in this specific case but we have to consider various factors so it's never just as simple as just adding an option.
Honestly if we added every option without some scrutiny then the software would just be a hot bloaty mess.
In this particular case, my only takeaway really is that an option still isn't required but maybe we could just consider making it longer to account for what is ultimately an edge case.
Either way, the feedback is noted.
Also, to be clear, I wasn't actually showing negativity towards the concept of an option itself, or a change to make the hard-coded period longer, I was just trying to get my head around the three weeks thing which, for the record, is still not a great idea, IMHO, and that appears to be a feeling that is being echoed by others and it's really an entirely separate issue to this feature or whether we add an option or not. But it's your forum, feel free to manage it how you please.
