zappaDPJ
Well-known member
Just tick a box to say you are the parent?The most popular option seems to be parent or guardian proving age, but I can't see how that works as how would they prove it?

Just tick a box to say you are the parent?The most popular option seems to be parent or guardian proving age, but I can't see how that works as how would they prove it?
So maybe that option can be ignored! I'm a parent (without verifying I am) and I say my child is over 16/18 or whatever. Unless it means getting a parent to do their age verification document scanning for them? Because they're nervous about having their documents scanned? Or unless it means - I want my parent to pretend they are meJust tick a box to say you are the parent?I agree, that seems totally unworkable.
Yeah, for some sites, blocking entire UK visitor base might be best. Or for such sites just start showing more VPN affiliate advertisements LOLThey've boycotted the Uk. So presumably they did have uk users ........... "no presence" presumably means the owner and server are in the US. A notice on their web page here.
In light of these findings, made the encryption/decryption process easier to understand for usersFacial age recognition not that popular though
![]()
Age assurance and online safety: What parents and children have to say
Age assurance views from parents and children | Internet Matters. See parents' and children's views on age verification online.www.internetmatters.org
View attachment 321839
View attachment 321840
Ah but that wouldn't work - it fails if you wear glasses
There's also a risk once facial age verification is implemented across the internet, more young folks try to game the technology and may expose potential weaknesses in accuracy and force OFCOM to rule out facial age estimation as allowable method. Then website operators would be stuck prepaying/paying for tech they can't use. Are OFCOM and those providers going to refund all their customers?I'm still at a blank though.
Affordable Options
One ID is offputting, when entering your banking app. And limited to Uk users and people who do online banking (despite being free)
Shufti Pro is the most affordable option - but offputting because users need to tick a box to say they consent to Shufti using and storing their data.
Expensive options:
Verifymy has two good options but needs £2000 upfront (and ongoing would be about £50 a month
Luciditi has an annual fee of over £550 as well as verifications, which, with VAT makes it about £900 a year for 100 verifications a month.
Yoti is out of the question at £200 a month.
Not something I noticed. The only "bug" I kept hitting was when (and granted this was via their API) setting an age for the verification was that it didn't reliably work unless I set the min and max ages (docs clearly showed that you could just set a min). As to the backend being a bit slow - yep I found everything was a little sluggish in general (including the checking).So I'm trialling Shufti Pro. Their backend seems a bit slow to load. Facial estimation seems to work well. Tried ID Document as well and that works well and you can opt to only extract date of birth from it. The first one I tested (myself) came up with a tick to show it was verified. After that it kept coming up with a message about waiting for approval? Did you find that @chillibear? Even though it showed as approved in the backend.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.