MaximilianKohler
Well-known member
Context: https://www.theadminzone.com/thread...s-especially-if-using-ses.155701/post-1189451
It's too hard to find stuff in the ACP. Another example:
The main "Email" page should either have a "set email logo" link to the styles page, or at least have some helper text like "You can set an email logo on the styles page".
However, even after I set an "Email logo URL" on the styles page, it still doesn't show up in test emails. So again, the ACP is too obscure. I have to spend so much time searching the forum for answers to basic stuff.
It's taken me like an hour to find out about the email logo option, set it, and test it. And I still haven't succeeded.
EDIT:
We should not be having to edit templates https://xenforo.com/community/threads/logo-on-emails-really-simple-way.157687/post-1511071 to do something this basic.
And it seems like the logo is already automatically included for the "activity summary" emails, but not other emails. Is that an oversight/bug? Seems so.
And the fact that the activity summary email uses
It's too hard to find stuff in the ACP. Another example:
The main "Email" page should either have a "set email logo" link to the styles page, or at least have some helper text like "You can set an email logo on the styles page".
However, even after I set an "Email logo URL" on the styles page, it still doesn't show up in test emails. So again, the ACP is too obscure. I have to spend so much time searching the forum for answers to basic stuff.
It's taken me like an hour to find out about the email logo option, set it, and test it. And I still haven't succeeded.
EDIT:
We should not be having to edit templates https://xenforo.com/community/threads/logo-on-emails-really-simple-way.157687/post-1511071 to do something this basic.
And it seems like the logo is already automatically included for the "activity summary" emails, but not other emails. Is that an oversight/bug? Seems so.
And the fact that the activity summary email uses
emailPublicLogoUrl instead of the "Email logo URL", seems like another oversight/bug.
Last edited:
Upvote
2