Reply to thread

This could be partially a misunderstanding on my part of what the software does, as no other forum software assumes you have read a thread based on age alone, if you haven't actually read it, certainly I have never seen anything like this behaviour in over 10 years of forum exposure. But I would like to check if I have it right...


I just clicked on a thread I have not read before, and it took me to the middle of the second page on a two page total.  As it happens this thread turns out to be from the 30th July ... now that I realise that your software does this odd 10 day thing "mark as read" regardless, I can see that might be the reason I have been taken to the middle of the last page.. as presumably the other posts before that are 10days or more old.


If I have this correct, I think there is going to be a huge amount of resistance to this in the market place, I know you are going to confuse and annoy the heck out of people with this.


Actually I just checked the thread out, and I was wrong, the post it took me too is from Saturday, and there were dozens of posts prior to that, in fact most of the posts in this thread are less than 10 days old.





Here is where I landed...



Sorry if I am being obtuse here, I have just never come across this kind of behaviour when clicking a thread title.


Back
Top Bottom