AMPXF - AMP for Xenforo 2 [Paid] 1.4.9

[Gri]

Is it usergroup based? For example, can we enable AMPXF only for guests?

 

[duderuud]

No, it's not user based. AMP is meant for users that are redirected from Google. Most of them would be guests.

 

[Gri]

I'm using AMP on Wordpress too. It doesn't matter if you're redirected from Google or type the address from Chrome mobile. It just switches to AMP when browsing on mobile. I don't want my users to browse site with AMP version.

 

[Chromaniac]

i am not sure what addon you are using on wordpress that loads amp pages by force on mobile browser. but with this addon, the only way to land on an amp page is through a google search on mobile browser. and every link on the amp page would direct the user to regular page.

 

[hasanakyuz]

Unfortunately that is all that Google is offering me.

I don't use Auto-Ads on the rest of my site. When I enable AMP Auto Amp ads are the only thing made available to me.

I wonder where you added adsense amp codes? AMP_CONTAINER?

 

[mazzly]

For ad related questions please see if the FAQ can help: https://ampxf.com/faq/ads

 

[Chromaniac]

55% of my traffic is now AMP. I am not complaining though it is kind of sad that @Siropu keyword linking is not compatible with amp pages so i miss out on potential clicks on affiliate links on these hits.

just a fyi, @Siropu released an update today that enabled keyword link addon support on amp pages. just hours after i asked him if it was possible!

 

[diretur]

Hi @mazzly
I've written this to you in a pm but I think it could be of public interest: google core web vitals.
Tha amp version of my forums doesn't pass the test:



Looking into details:


amp scripts that are unused when the test is run, or:



third party (? it's amp's own js!) code

Do you have an idea on how to solve this?

Thanks

 

[Academic]

@mazzly Can we have a link https://ampxf.com/ Problematic pages to verify all fixes by one click? As there can be a fix that applies to many issues. Thanks.

 

[mazzly]

Hi @mazzly
I've written this to you in a pm but I think it could be of public interest: google core web vitals.
Tha amp version of my forums doesn't pass the test:
View attachment 251209


Looking into details:
View attachment 251210

amp scripts that are unused when the test is run, or:

View attachment 251211

third party (? it's amp's own js!) code

Do you have an idea on how to solve this?

Thanks

There is a long-running thread on this over at https://github.com/ampproject/amphtml/issues/28638

But basically it seems the pagespeed insights isn't really "aware" that AMP scripts are optimized and might benchmark some things as "bad".

The pagespeed insights tool isn't perfect and will show things that might not make sense, and therefore it is good to think critically also if those things are needed or not.. In this case all of those resources are needed..


In Google Search Console there is now the "Page Experience" tab that shows how many good pages you have. If you check that one the Good URLs should be mostly AMP pages, while the bad URLs are all the canonical pages.

@mazzly Can we have a link https://ampxf.com/ Problematic pages to verify all fixes by one click? As there can be a fix that applies to many issues. Thanks.

Please open a support ticket and we will start a bulk re-verification for you
We don't want to add a button like this because it could be misused to spam our Bot-workers unnecessarily.

 

[mazzly]

mazzly updated AMPXF - AMP for Xenforo 2 with a new update entry:

1.4.1

• Bugfix: Tumblr embeds showing a broken url in some situations
• New installations: Ping sitemap for faster indexing

Read the rest of this update entry...

 

[deslocotoco]

Why mazzly has not yet been hired by XenForo?

There are so much great developers around here, doing better work than XF themselves.

Thanks for the update mazzly, great work as always!

 

[mazzly]

mazzly updated AMPXF - AMP for Xenforo 2 with a new update entry:

1.4.2 Beta 1

This is a Beta release, only install if you know what that means, or your forum runs on a "subpath" like /forums

• Fix inline styles to have full path to reactions/smiley assets so they render correctly
  • Forums that are running on subpath like e.g. /forum or /community won't show reactions otherwise

Read the rest of this update entry...

 

[duderuud]

Hi @mazzly , got a request.

Can you disable the update notification in the admin backend for beta versions?

 

[Chromaniac]

isn't it there already?

 

[duderuud]

Yes it is, thanks for that!

@mazzly has thought of everything

 

[rickhz]

@mazzly Can we have a link https://ampxf.com/ Problematic pages to verify all fixes by one click? As there can be a fix that applies to many issues. Thanks.

I agree. I fixed one issue which fixed many pages. When I clicked verify on the fixed pages, one after another, it said I was spamming the server.

 

[otto]

What did you say about this: https://plausible.io/blog/google-amp

Is AMP death now?

 

[mazzly]

What did you say about this: https://plausible.io/blog/google-amp

Is AMP death now?

Has been discussed a couple of times already in this thread, but to summarize:

• XF threads were never showing up in the top carousel anyway (this new change makes non-AMP pages be allowed there)
• AMP pages are still faster than the canonical pages (especially for XF) + they are cached on the search engines for really fast delivery

I'm wondering why that article keeps talking about "Google AMP", since AMP is no longer a google product, and hasn't been for years.
The author seems to want to push for their own "light-weight analytics" by bashing AMP and saying lightweight is possible without AMP (it is) so I would take the claims in the article with a grain of salt

 

[MisakiTaro]

AMP is a useless thing, but the new that you sent is a complete lie. AMP is still preferred by Google.