The Software may be permanently transferred by the original purchaser to a third party ("Subsequent Licensee") not before 120 days following purchase, provided that the expiry date of the License falls after the date of the transfer. The original licensee may not retain a copy or installation of the Software. The Subsequent Licensee must agree to the terms of this Agreement and waive the right to transfer.
I'm not really sure you people can hug their nuts any more than you already are...
Who cares what other companies do? Who buys a license with the intention of selling it anyways?120 days??? Why is that. Don't know of other softwares that do that.
120 days??? Why is that. Don't know of other softwares that do that.
'The Subsequent Licensee must agree to the terms of this Agreement and waive the right to transfer.'
does this mean that that licenses purchased from a third party are non-transferable?
if so, this impacts a second-hand licenses value negatively...
Good catch. That's rather interesting, in a not-so-good way.'The Subsequent Licensee must agree to the terms of this Agreement and waive the right to transfer.'
does this mean that that licenses purchased from a third party are non-transferable?
if so, this impacts a second-hand licenses value negatively...
Why is that not-so-good? It discourages multiple transfers of a license.Good catch. That's rather interesting, in a not-so-good way.
Why is that not-so-good? It discourages multiple transfers of a license.
Exactly. What's so wrong with multiple transfers?Why is that not-so-good? It discourages multiple transfers of a license.
Even further, how could it be a bad thing for any reasonable company?such a policy would have the effect of diminishing a licenses resale value, which could be seen as 'not good'.
why would multiple transfers of a license be a bad thing for the consumer?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.