Add this to responsive_extra.cssCode:#loginBar form { height: auto !important; }
.xenOverlay.attachmentUploader { width: 290px !important; }
#Notices { display: block !important; }
#header_bar .itemLabel { padding-top: 5px; }
.breadBoxTop, .breadBoxBottom { margin-left: 0 !important; margin-right: 0 !important; padding-left: 0 !important; padding-right: 0 !important; }
.navTab.selected div.navLink a.navDivLink { color: #56575A !important; text-shadow: none; height: auto; background-image: none; }
#loginBar form { height: auto !important; }
#logo { height: 30px; line-height: 30px; padding-top: 15px; }
WYSIWYG editor is not shown on mobile devices, so its not a problem. You can only see it when faking small window in normal browser.
Thanks for explaining, I misunderstood problem. Try adding this to editor_dialog.css:Was this in reply to my insert link popup problem? Because this is happening on desktop devices at full screen, even on your demo site.
html.editorPopup,
.editorPopup body
{
min-width: 0 !important;
}
Add-on doesn't change behavior of attachments. To convert to lower resolution click button to add images as thumbnails to post after uploading images.What do they have their maximum attachment file size set as? I have some iphone users that are trying to upload pics but its saying the file size is too large. Is it possible to convert these to a lower resolution upon upload?
Add-ons that don't change html and css should all work fine. This add-on has built in support for: xenPorta, xenAtendo, FooterPie, sfDirectory, User Albums.Also, is there a list of addons that are compatible? For example: XenPorta or Notifications Add-on?
Tested it, works fine.Has anyone used this with Whisper 2 style?
http://xenforo.com/community/resources/whisper-2.53/
Thanks for explaining, I misunderstood problem. Try adding this to editor_dialog.css:
Style works differently. Add-on messes with margin/padding for header block + absolute positioning of some elements in order to show menu, which is far from optimal. Style swaps header and content blocks, so content flow is natural and there is no need to use css tricks. Unfortunately same can't be done with add-on because header code is different for different styles, so it would cause a lot of conflicts with third party styles.Thought it worth mentioning that this add-on does not have a conflict with "Better Blogs" ..... It works ! !
So I'm wondering what is the difference as to why "Responsive Design" (this add-on) works, but the style "Soft Responsive" doesn't. They basically do the same thing and although I'm new to both... I believe they do it the same way.
So what's changed......? !?
(Just thinking out loud. Maybe someone will catch what I missed)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.