Digital Doctor
Well-known member
I read that England doesn't recognize Diplomatic Immunity.
I'm reading some of the replies here and can't help but either feel pity for some of you; for simply being ignorant and just not knowing any better or simply just laugh at your stupidity.
If speaking the truth is wrong.....There's a way to promote discussion and get one's point across, but this isn't it.
At times it is.If speaking the truth is wrong.....
If speaking the truth is wrong.....
To be guilty of treason... You have to be a citizen or served the country in question.Bottom line is he was involved in treason against the United States. If you think any country is going to really protect him beyond the point of "what do we get for releasing him" you need to loosen that mask a bit as it's cutting off the circulation to your brain. Right now his immunity is like a poker game and Ecuador is waiting for the countries involved to put out their chips to see who has more to offer in exchange for release to them. Ecuador has a week to decide which jack pot to take before they will be forced to fold.
Assange is a "bad guy" to both the US and UK, he's not a hero, nor a freedom fighter.
If you truly honestly think this has anything to do with the women or rape, I think you are mistaken.Or rape women, which is the reason for the UK's attempt to nab him..
To be guilty of treason... You have to be a citizen or served the country in question.
He has done and is neither
I'm a firm and sound supporter of WikiLeaks.
Then why does he feel the need to hide behind Ecuador? If he did nothing wrong, he would receive a fair trial and released.
So you support a site that takes part in illegal activity and puts citizens of nations at risk by releasing classified information about on going military operations that are fighting for world freedom? Kinda contradicting imo.. Your not supporting the freedom of speech you claim. Your supporting terrorist nations that want full control and world dictation though fear, how is that freedom of speech?
And who says they are fighting for world freedom?So you support a site that takes part in illegal activity and puts citizens of nations at risk by releasing classified information about on going military operations that are fighting for world freedom and against countries that take part in terrorist acts against innocent citizens? Kinda contradicting imo.. Your not supporting the freedom of speech you claim. Your supporting terrorist nations that want full control and world dictation though fear, how is that freedom of speech? As a vet myself, I'd love the chance to personally take out Assange.
And who says they are fighting for world freedom?
How do you relate all those wars being fought the last few years to terrorism? I can understand Afghanistan, but Irak got infested by terrorists after the invasion, not before. Pretty sure that war was more about the oil reserves there, and securing Kuwait's oil reserves, rather than anything else. Funny how no government seems overly worried about the people of Syria's freedom, even though they are fighting for it with tooth and nail.Because we'd still have the freedoms we have today if Al-Qaeda succeeded in it's terrorist operations? The same ones Assange tried to expose and cause harm to these troops fighting against such groups as Al-Qaeda by leaking classified information on active operations against these groups.
Allow me to give you some personal insight... 9/11 was an inside job. Period.Because we'd still have the freedoms we have today if Al-Qaeda succeeded in it's terrorist operations? The same ones Assange tried to expose and cause harm to these troops fighting against such groups as Al-Qaeda by leaking classified information on active operations against these groups.
How do you relate all those wars being fought the last few years to terrorism? I can understand Afghanistan, but Irak got infested by terrorists after the invasion, not before. Pretty sure that war was more about the oil reserves there, and securing Kuwait's oil reserves, rather than anything else. Funny how no government seems overly worried about the people of Syria's freedom, even though they are fighting for it with tooth and nail.
Oh my lol.Allow me to give you some personal insight... 9/11 was an inside job. Period.
uh. uh. not really. Exclamation mark.Allow me to give you some personal insight... 9/11 was an inside job. Period.
Just because the truth sucks... Doesn't make it any less true.uh. uh. not really. Exclamation mark.
Don't derail this thread with fringe theories of 911.
Why seizing Assange could break international law
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2012/08/16/foreign-embassy-julian-assange-sovereignty.html
Allow me to give you some personal insight... 9/11 was an inside job. Period.
Guessing by your "theories" in this thread and supporter of such sites like Wiki Leaks, you were a pencil pushier and not someone who served in the front lines of combat for it's country. But enough of your derailing off the subject of what a scumbag Assange isAs I said, I use to work for the government and I know exactly what my government is fully capable of.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.