Recalculation for the new year 2026 seems partly delayed: 10,5 hours into the new year and sadly there's no way my forum had 4.000.000 thread views over these couple of hours. :p (in fact this number is - in opposite to the others - from 2025.
Bug in the frontend: Missing Phrase in "active users": shows "pb_yearrecap_mostly_in" instead of the phrase.
Fixed itself after updating the caches for each year w/o checking the second option there:
The updating w/o the second option was necessary to show the newly calculated threads view...
I see the same in various rankings of the addon for myself. Probably a question of how you display the value. It your forum has let's say 20.000 members and you are regarding the number of threads placed at rank 25 this would make you better than 99,875% of all members. Rounded this would be...
Active users seems indeed also a bit off for the current year: According to the stats I would have had the most active users by far in December which does not at all correlate with the usual pattern of my forum (winter is calm in comparison to spring, autumn and summer) and also not to the...
Indeed thread views seem to be way off. My forum was created in Sept 2022, so only three month in 2022 with very limited users. Statistic says:
• 200 new Users (correct)
• 16 active users (which is clearly incorrect by miles)
• 233 new threads (correct)
• 741.000 thread views (which seems way...
Sure. A proper solution for a integrated fully fledged wiki, integrated into XF (including search) would be highly desirable. The existing solutions (external wikis as well as XF add ons) seem somewhat unsatisfying.
However: In the first place my post was about to clarify if what the OP wants...
Isn't this a normal statistical effect as possibly all threadviews since creation up until today are calculated? So a thread created back in 2022 will often have many more views than one created in 2025 simply because it had a couple more years to gain views?
If that's the case it makes a bit of...
Seems that - regarding what you want to achieve (the WHAT) - you are basically describing a wiki. Just that you focussed on the HOW instead of the what and ended up with something that basically no forum user apart from devs would be able to use (Git, pull requests etc.). So why not simply use a...
This add on does the job. I run it on 2.2 but it is listed to work on 2.3 as well:
https://xenforo.com/community/resources/al-original-poster-highlight.6134/
However: There seem to be issues with 2.3:
https://xenforo.com/community/threads/al-original-poster-highlight.142428/post-1716355...
@Pepe2012 : Other than that: There are loads of threads about the Gallery add on. One of the more recent ones about the Gallery Add On in general is this:
https://xenforo.com/community/threads/is-media-gallery-worth-buying.228081/
but there are dozens of threads about various aspects and...
Where? :oops: Did you work with it intensively in front- and backend? Apart from that: The advertizing claim "There's at least one Media Gallery on the market that is worse than our's" wouldn't be very convincing in my eyes. ;) XenForo shines in many areas, the MG is one of it's (very) dark...
Sure, but given the request of the OP there is a high probabilty that it won't make him happy. I had four typical usecases in mind when I bought and installed the MG add on:
1. Collective albums for events, where various users could upload their photos to
2. Collective albums for certain topics...
You should however be aware that said
is pretty horrible. It is dated, has a horrible user experience and ui, lacks even the most basic features and i.e. creating an album where other people can upload to in a useful way is awkward. Furthermore you cannot i.e. sort photos inside of an album...