We can only provide support to licensed customers. If you are licensed, please add your forum username to the Forum users page in your Account area and then post in the correct forum.
We can only provide support to licensed customers. If you are licensed, please add your forum username to the Forum users page in your Account area and then post in the correct forum.
This is already the case for most exceptions, this is a special case as the error is merely logged and compiled anyway. I would make this change for the next release if it weren't for the fact that it becomes a regular exception then already.
The change was made in 2.3.7, so 2.3.6 will not log...
If you experience it when attempting updating the add-on, it's likely one of the templates belonging to the add-on. It's possible it doesn't exist in the installed version. You might want to search the _output/templates/ directory if you are the developer.
We can only provide support to licensed customers. If you are licensed, please add your forum username to the Forum users page in your Account area and then post in the correct forum.
We can only provide support to licensed customers. If you are licensed, please add your forum username to the Forum users page in your Account area and then post in the correct forum.
We can only provide support to licensed customers. If you are licensed, please add your forum username to the Forum users page in your Account area and then post in the correct forum.
At first I thought this might be an issue with unstable sort order when caching route filters. They are ordered by length of the replacement, but in this case both replacement values are the same, meaning the last one in the set wins. However, when stabilizing the sort order in either direction...
Not in a first class way, but they're ultimately just database entries so you can just insert them using the entity system or directly (just make sure to run any cache rebuild methods if doing the latter).
You should check your server logs to identify what rule is being triggered. It will almost certainly just be a false positive from an overzealous rule that is incompatible with XF.