Search results

  1. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    The message is phrased, so you can customize it, however the numbers provided are static. You could edit the template if you want, all numbers needed are accessible. A matter of preference. It's just as correct as the other one. There's no original widget, so not sure what you are referring to.
  2. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    (847 - 600) * 100 / (1000 - 600) = (247) * 100 / (400) = 24.700 / 400 = 61.75
  3. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    (Current Points - Points needed for last level) * 100 / (Points needed for next level - Points needed for last level) => Progress Percentage
  4. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    Multiple sizes to fit all software use cases: 'o' => 2560, 'l' => 1200, 'm' => 700, 's' => 350, Those are the max widths. The aspect ratio is preserved.
  5. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    Covers are automatically scaled by the software upon upload.
  6. Lukas W.

    [TH] Reactions Plus [Paid]

    You're aware that you can remove our copyright notice free of charge?
  7. Lukas W.

    [TH] Question and Answer Forums [Paid]

    Looks like an issue in CMTVs add-on. There's a value on the thread being set during _postSave().
  8. Lukas W.

    XF 2.1 Generating a list of threads from thread IDs

    Independently of the given problem, updating an additional table when already performing a write operation is a neglectible cost. There'll be no feelable impact. Running a query of that size will render your site slow for a few moments as your number of posts, threads and users grows. Fwiw, I...
  9. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    We can make a big discussion out of this if you want, but the tl;dr is that we don't blindly copy-paste suggested bug fixes but rather check the software and code if that is actually fixing the issue and not just bandaging it on the surface, so no errors follow up, similar issues may also be...
  10. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    I'm not sure what else you want me to tell you. There's a cover that has been applied to a resource. You can delete it in the ACP cover browser most likely. I can't tell you how it got there, all I can tell you is that it is there, and that it is, what is causing the error.
  11. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    Because we decided to publish an fix for a breaking problem that affects more installations now rather than holding it back until we trialed the other fixes. I think everyone agrees that it's to everyones benefit if we don't hold back patch releases until every problem is fixed. ;)
  12. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    The cover that throws the error was made on a resource. If the resource manager is currently disabled, then somebody who tried to manually access the cover in question produced that error. It's not a bug in the product either way. You should be able to delete the cover in the ACP cover browser...
  13. Lukas W.

    [TH] Donate [Paid]

    Which widget specifically?
  14. Lukas W.

    [TH] User Improvements

    They would've been mentioned in the change log if they were.
  15. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    Have you disabled the resource manager? Looks like somebody tried to access a cover URL for a resource cover after the resource manager has been disabled/removed or was in the process of being updated. I've found (and fixed) an issue that would wrongly queue covers for the approval queue, but...
  16. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    This looks like a theme issue.
  17. Lukas W.

    XPress - A theme and bridge for bringing WordPress into XenForo

    As previously, please check the troubleshooting section in the documentation.
  18. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    Can you try a permission cache rebuild?
  19. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    Judging from your stack trace it appears you're not running the latest version.
  20. Lukas W.

    [TH] Covers [Paid]

    This is controlled by the default "Submit content without approval" permission.
Top