And all this has what to do with Bin Laden?
And all this has what to do with Bin Laden?
About as much as September 11 had to do with Iraq.And all this has what to do with Bin Laden?
And all this has what to do with Bin Laden?
About as much as XenForo had to do with vBulletin's pissed off customers.About as much as September 11 had to do with Iraq.
Where did I say I knew the man? I merely stated that I do not have to be influenced by media, but am more than clever enough to do my own research and base my opinion on that. You also seem to think that all media takes the same course.
Some channels most certainly will lean towards a specific angle. Fox to the right, the great majority of the Dutch media the exact other way. If you make sure you are aware of the bias in such channels, you can ensure you educate yourself and at least are exposed to both sides of the spectrum.
There are many, many cases where the media presented one version of "the truth", and where a bit of research will show something totally different.
But have it your way. I'll even go "Baa" if it'll make you happy. But being a guy coming from a farm, I'd advise you not to see that as an encouragement in any way. Baa means no
I agree Sept 11 and Iraq had nothing in common.About as much as September 11 had to do with Iraq.
I agree Sept 11 and Iraq had nothing in common.
...The danger is clear: Using chemical, biological or, one day, nuclear weapons obtained with the help of Iraq, the terrorists could fulfill their stated ambitions and kill thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people in our country or any other. The United States and other nations did nothing to deserve or invite this threat, but we will do everything to defeat it. Instead of drifting along toward tragedy, we will set a course toward safety.
Before the day of horror can come, before it is too late to act, this danger will be removed. The United States of America has the sovereign authority to use force in assuring its own national security. That duty falls to me as commander-in-chief by the oath I have sworn, by the oath I will keep....
According to Bush.everything to do with 9/11 ....
According to Bush.
We can discuss this ad infinitum. Clearly there was no plan, but there was an agenda. The war was staged for the media. Photo op after photo op.All I'm saying is if the President says that a rogue country has WMDs, and could one day be used in terror attacks, and that it is urgent to remove such a threat, quite frankly the country shouldn't give a damn about what the UN says. If Bush is guilty of anything is of deceiving his own people, and lying about the info he had on hand.
World War II flashback: Germany invaded France, Poland, Soviet Union, bombed Britain because Hitler said so.All I'm saying is if the President says that a rogue country has WMDs, and could one day be used in terror attacks, and that it is urgent to remove such a threat, quite frankly the country shouldn't give a damn about what the UN says.
Would you hold Hugo Chavez accountable if he invades the U.S. and causes death to thousands of citizens? Or would he be only guilty of deceiving his own people, Venezuelans?If Bush is guilty of anything is of deceiving his own people, and lying about the info he had on hand.
World War II flashback: Germany invaded France, Poland, Soviet Union, bombed Britain because Hitler said so.
Would you hold Hugo Chavez accountable if he invades the U.S. and causes death to thousands of citizens? Or would he be only guilty of deceiving his own people, Venezuelians?
I think that a President should not be held accountable because he was democratically elected, and shouldn't be judged by the actions he took as President.
All I'm saying is if the President says that a rogue country has WMDs, and could one day be used in terror attacks, and that it is urgent to remove such a threat, quite frankly the country shouldn't give a damn about what the UN says. If Bush is guilty of anything is of deceiving his own people, and lying about the info he had on hand.
You don't think that as a result of deceiving 'his people' and starting an illegal war, with the help of his lapdog Blair, he's not also guilty for the deaths of 100,000's in Iraq?
I would really like to know what influenced your opinions towards OBL, if you don't mind.
You have admitted to not know the guy and also that you do not have to be influenced by the media(which you later claim not to be the case, see paragraph 2). I can tell you that I neither like or dislike the guy, I haven't had the time, nor the resources to do my very own research. I surely won't just go and read what others want me to believe and base my opinions on that, even less now that the guy is dead and cannot speak for himself.
If people wanted to form their own opinion about me, it's only natural for them to meet me and get to know me.
Now, if they just based their opinions on what they were told by two unknown people, then they really don't know me and they cannot claim otherwise.
Thanks for such a long reply, but I don't want you to waste your time. As you have stated, your opinions were greatly influenced by the media, that's a fact and that's my point.
Also, it would be interesting to know your opinion on me, based on my "words" lol. (if you have the time, of course.)
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.